Manufacturing/Published: December 4, 2025

Rethinking Accountability: Building Ownership on the Plant Floor

Josh Santo Headshot
Written by:
Josh SantoDirector of Industry Strategy & Solutions, EASE
Read time: 6 mins
Rethinking Accountability: Building Ownership on the Plant Floor Blog Img

Recurring problems haunt manufacturing floors. You fix one, and it comes back. You fix it again, but the same issue returns. Audit results swing wildly between shifts, and the frontline stops speaking up. Leaders talk about accountability, but the cycle continues and the fire drills never really change anything.

I recently listened to Dr. Rebecca Teeters, Senior Vice President of Business Supply Chain and President at 3M Chemical Operations, lay out a different vision. Each morning, she brings teams together and asks a simple question: Did we win the day yesterday? For Dr. Teeters, accountability is not dictated from above. Real change starts when teams own meaningful metrics and focus on learning. Her approach moves past punishment, shifting the focus to visibility, systems, and lasting ownership.

The Old Model of Accountability — And Why It Fails

Accountability on the plant floor often means punishment after the fact. The old model waits for mistakes, then “holds people accountable” with pressure and threats. This approach drives fear and triggers fire drills, not real change.

Leaders often rely on lagging metrics and monthly reports, but by the time those numbers show up, the real issues have already grown. Visibility gaps leave leaders guessing and disconnect teams from what matters most.

Short-term fixes become the norm. Teams scramble to avoid blame, patch symptoms, and move on. “Holding someone accountable is a very antiquated idea of, well, I’ll punish you later if you don’t hit a number.” Blame cycles set in. Trust breaks down. Learning stops. The same issues return again and again. True improvement slips further away while the old cycle grinds on, leaving everyone frustrated and disengaged.

Inspired Ownership: A New Vision for the Plant Floor

Dr. Teeters does not see accountability as a top-down demand. She believes, “True accountability is when every individual in the organization chooses to take accountability for doing what needs to be done.” For her, real ownership grows when teams have visibility to meaningful, winnable metrics that they can actually influence.

Every morning, her teams meet and ask, “Did we win the day yesterday?” The focus stays on learning and improvement, not blame. When teams lose, the conversation shifts to what can change in the system, never who gets the blame.

Dr. Teeters builds a culture where teams take pride in progress and feel responsible for results. This approach inspires people to step up, not check out, and sets a new standard for ownership on the plant floor.

Designing Systems That Enable Accountability

Accountability shifts when you stop “holding people accountable” and start building systems that guide real action. Dr. Teeters calls for thermostatic metrics: “You want it to be more like a thermostat than a thermometer. The thermometer tells me the temperature of the room. That’s great, but really what I want are thermostatic metrics, metrics that I can actually use to adjust the temperature in the room.”

“Ideal Results Require Ideal Behaviors.
Purpose and Systems Drive Behavior.
Principles Inform Ideal Behaviors.”

Teams need to shape their leading indicators. Each factory defines the variables that matter for safety, quality, service, cost, and cash. They connect those variables back to business goals, so the metrics drive behavior, not just reporting.

Standardization still matters. Every site measures output the same way, but how they improve stays local. “They need to believe that they are playing a winnable game. They need a metric they have control over that they can change and improve themselves.” That balance between the “what” and the “how” builds true ownership.

Coaching, Psychological Safety, and the Discipline of Leadership

Great leaders do not give answers. They ask the questions that help teams solve their own problems.

And those leaders also set coaching as the expectation, even in high-pressure moments. That’s why Dr. Teeters asks her team to call her out when she slips into “barking orders” instead of guiding the discussion. That level of openness makes it safe for people to surface problems and challenge assumptions without worrying about how it will land. That builds trust and keeps everyone aligned on how they want to work together.

Respect and honesty matter more than hierarchy. Every role, from supervisor to operator, has a voice. The discipline of leadership is about coaching real change, not directing from above.

From Firefighting to Systemic Improvement

“Hero syndrome” takes over on the plant floor. Quick fixes bring applause, but the same problems always return. Dr. Teeters calls this out plainly. “We often design the standard work so that if you’re fully trained, you have five years experience and you’re having a good day, you can get it right. We need to design the standard that if you’re fully trained with minimal experience, and even on your worst day, you can’t get it wrong.”

Real progress means closing the gap for good. True success comes when teams solve root causes and mistake-proof systems, not just react to the next crisis. Rewarding improvement, not just emergency response, transforms firefighting into lasting change. That is how manufacturing moves forward.

The Role of Digital Tools in Sustaining Ownership

This is a topic that is near and dear to us here at EASE.

Digital tools transform the way teams see their impact each day. Real-time dashboards put wins and losses out in the open, so no one works in the dark. With every action tracked, accountability moves from memory to visible proof. Teams know what got solved and what still needs attention.

Automated action lists close the loop on follow-through. Nothing slips through the cracks. Everyone can see progress, not just managers. This builds trust and keeps people engaged.

Digital routines turn improvement into a steady habit. Each shift starts with clear data and ends with lessons learned. “We have a dynamic dashboard of some nature. We assign ownership, that person has responsibility and we go get it done,” Dr. Teeters said.

Where Ownership-Driven Leadership Leads

Cultures shaped by ownership don’t just hit targets; they build pride on the plant floor and keep teams committed through setbacks. Dr. Teeters captured it best: “True accountability is when every individual in the organization chooses to take accountability for doing what needs to be done.”

Leaders set the tone when they coach, design systems, and invite teams to own the outcome. Systems built for learning, not blame, make excellence possible. Teams start to see mistakes as signals, not failures.

Ownership moves manufacturers out of survival mode. It creates resilience that lasts beyond a single project or shift. With real ownership, manufacturing teams find meaning in their work and move from just getting by to making a real difference.

To discover how to implement a new accountability system within your organization, tune in to the complete episode of The Shop Floor, Top Floor Talk Show podcast.

Join Richard Nave and Josh Santo as they explore why the usual approach to accountability can actually be a barrier preventing a true Culture of Quality.
Watch ondemand

Related articles